The one machine I wanted if I go back to then apart from a Pismo G3 was a 9600/300. Of course I couldn’t afford either at the time so I settled on a 7600/200 which later become a 7600/400 G4 when I removed the CPU daughter board and replaced it with a G4, 10GB of high speed SCSI disk space and 256mb of RAM in banks of 64mb and 4mb of VRAM for 1280x1024 on a 17" Apple Trinitron monitor which self calibrated. I built that machine to what it was over time and it was a rocket ship for running Photoshop 7 and Illustrator 8 on such a low footprint operating system that was OS 8.6 which took up just 32mb of RAM which by comparison to now my system eats 6.75gb actively out of 8gb of RAM.
I can take having a laptop which inherently has a soldered on CPU but when you tell me I can’t change out the RAM or the hard disk because you want to make the machine thinner than two slices of bread, I’ve had enough with that. You’re treating me like some kind of cretin when I’ve got a Dip. IT.
In the 90s those machines had a habit of staying in service for 6 and 7 years at a time. Today you want me to upgrade an entire machine because I want to go from 8GB to 16GB that just doesn’t make much sense.
I’ve pretty much been a Mac user since the beginning, our schools first Macs were LCs. I pretty well don’t want to afford a machine with 16gb of RAM now only for that to be outdated in 1.5years time. So go figure…